Products related to Judging:
-
Judging from Experience : Law, Praxis, Humanities
Combining her expertise in legal theory and judicial practice in a continental European civil-law system, Jeanne Gaakeer explores the intertwinement of legal theory and practice to develop a humanities-inspired methodology for both the academic interdisciplinary study of law and literature and for legal practice.This volume addresses judgment and interpretation as a central concern within the field of law, literature and humanities.It is not only a study of law as praxis that combines academic legal theory with judicial practice, but proposes both as central to humanistic jurisprudence and as a training in the conduct of public life.Drawing extensively on philosophical and legal scholarship and through analysis of literary works from Gustave Flaubert, Robert Musil, Gerrit Achterberg, Ian McEwan, Michel Houellebecq and Juli Zeh, Jeanna Gaakeer proposes a perspective on law as part of the humanities that will inspire legal professionals, scholars and advanced students of law alike.
Price: 27.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Judges on Judging : Views from the Bench
Thoroughly revised and updated for this Fifth Edition, Judges on Judging offers insights into the judicial philosophies and political views of those on the bench. Broad in scope, this one-of-a-kind book features "off-the-bench" writings and speeches in which Supreme Court justices, as well as lower federal and state court judges, discuss the judicial process, constitutional interpretation, judicial federalism, and the role of the judiciary.Engaging introductory material provides students with necessary thematic and historical context making this book the perfect supplement to present a nuanced view of the judiciary. "Judges on Judging is consistently rated by my students as their favorite book in my class.No other single volume provides them with such a clear and accessible sense of what judges do, what courts do, and the way judges think about their roles and their courts." —Douglas Edlin, Dickinson College
Price: 81.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Reasoning, Judging, Deciding : The Science of Thinking
Are humans effective thinkers? How do we decide what is right? Can we avoid being duped by fake news?Thinking and Reasoning is the study of how humans think; exploring rationality, decision making and judgment within all contexts of life.With contemporary case studies and reflective questions to develop your understanding of key dilemmas, this book covers the fundamentals of the science behind thinking, reasoning, and decision-making, making it essential reading for any student of Thinking and Reasoning. From heuristic biases to the cognitive science of religion, and from artificial intelligence to conspiracy theories, Wastell & Howarth's text clearly and comprehensibly introduces you to the core theories of thinking, leaving no stone unturned, before showing you how to apply theory to practice. 'The unique selling point of the book is the inclusion of current topics and recent developments, a very good structure and it approaches the field from a very wide angle.'
Price: 42.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Constitutional Symmetry : Judging in a Divided Republic
Intense political disagreements over constitutional law and the Supreme Court have divided America.Constitutional Symmetry offers a fresh perspective by urging judges to make decisions that work 'symmetrically' across major partisan and ideological divides instead of favoring one partisan coalition over the other.Zachary S. Price argues this approach will aid the political process, align with the role morality of judging, and advance the framers' hopes for the Constitution.Chapters explore how this approach can encourage new solutions to fraught debates over free speech, religious liberty, separation of powers, federalism, affirmative action, gun rights, abortion, parental rights, and the law of democracy.Timely and innovative, this book is must-read for anyone seeking to understand the sources and implications of constitutional polarization in the contemporary United States.
Price: 29.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
-
Am I judging him too quickly?
It's important to take the time to gather all the necessary information before making a judgment about someone. Consider whether you have all the facts and whether you are making assumptions based on limited information. It's also helpful to consider the context and circumstances that may be influencing the person's behavior. Taking a step back and trying to understand the situation from their perspective can help you make a more informed judgment.
-
What is meant by pre-judging?
Pre-judging, also known as prejudice, refers to forming an opinion or judgment about someone or something before having all the relevant information or facts. It involves making assumptions based on stereotypes, biases, or limited knowledge, rather than taking the time to understand the individual or situation. Pre-judging can lead to unfair treatment, discrimination, and misunderstandings, and it is important to be aware of our own biases and strive to approach people and situations with an open mind.
-
Should one know someone before judging them?
It is important to get to know someone before passing judgment on them. By taking the time to understand a person's background, experiences, and perspectives, we can make more informed and fair assessments. Rushing to judgment without knowing someone can lead to misunderstandings and unfair assumptions. Building a relationship and gaining insight into someone's character can help us form more accurate opinions and treat others with empathy and respect.
-
What does the Bible say about judging?
The Bible teaches that we should not judge others, as we will be judged in the same way. In Matthew 7:1-2, Jesus says, "Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you." Instead, we are called to show love, mercy, and forgiveness to others, leaving judgment to God.
Similar search terms for Judging:
-
Judging and Emotion : A Socio-Legal Analysis
Judging and Emotion investigates how judicial officers understand, experience, display, manage and deploy emotions in their everyday work, in light of their fundamental commitment to impartiality. Judging and Emotion challenges the conventional assumption that emotion is inherently unpredictable, stressful or a personal quality inconsistent with impartiality.Extensive empirical research with Australian judicial officers demonstrates the ways emotion, emotional capacities and emotion work are integral to judicial practice.Judging and Emotion articulates a broader conception of emotion, as a social practice emerging from interaction, and demonstrates how judicial officers undertake emotion work and use emotion as a resource to achieve impartiality.A key insight is that institutional requirements, including conceptions of impartiality as dispassion, do not completely determine the emotion dimensions of judicial work.Through their everyday work, judicial officers construct and maintain the boundaries of an impartial judicial role which necessarily incorporates emotion and emotion work. Building on a growing interest in emotion in law and social sciences, this book will be of considerable importance to socio-legal scholars, sociologists, the judiciary, legal practitioners and all users of the courts.
Price: 37.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Judging Extreme Weather : Climate Science in Action
Written by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Rapporteur of Weather and Climate Extremes, this book addresses the reality of extreme weather—how it occurs, how we measure it, and what it means for our future. Weather affects everybody, and with the increasing impact of climate change and the prevalence of storms, droughts and floods, it is clear that we are affecting all aspects of weather.Consequently, people love to talk about weather, complain about it, argue about it—and be intrigued by it.Twenty-four/seven coverage of the weather, however, has helped foster a tendency for marked overstatement—the creation of misconceptions, exaggerations and, frankly, even outright lies.Leading expert in weather and climate, Randy Cerveny, draws on his extensive experience with the WMO and personal research to give the reader a behind-the-scenes look at how weather and climate extremes are recorded and defined.He unpacks the science behind these extremes through a number of specific WMO investigations that span a diverse range of countries and weather events, including lightning, rain, hurricanes and tornadoes.Cerveny balances these factual accounts with playful interludes that detail bizarre and intriguing weather-related stories and anecdotes. This compelling book is a must read for all those interested in the science behind extreme weather. Knowledge Exchange Quick Takes featuring Professor Randall Cerveny to discuss Weather Extremes. (youtube.com)
Price: 21.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Sex and Punishment : Four Thousand Years of Judging Desire
Sex and Punishment tells the story of the struggle throughout millennia to regulate the most powerful engine of human behaviour: sex.From the savage impalement of an Ancient Mesopotamian adulteress to the imprisonment of Oscar Wilde for `gross indecency’ in 1895, Eric Berkowitz evokes the entire sweep of Western sex law. The cast of Sex and Punishment is as varied as the forms taken by human desire itself: royal mistresses, gay charioteers, medieval transvestites, lonely goat-lovers, prostitutes of all stripes and London rent boys.Each of them had forbidden sex, and each was judged – and justice, as Berkowitz shows – rarely had anything to do with it.
Price: 11.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
The Judging Eye : Book 1 of the Aspect-Emperor
'"The Judging Eye" is an incredibly smart and smart ass title to a book that deceives in being Bakker's most straight forward read.How Bakker continues to move Kellhus in mysterious ways is something I can't wait to witness more of' - BookSpotCentral'Exquisitely intelligent and beautifully written...this is fantasy with muscle and brains, rife with intrigue and admirable depth of character, set in a world laden with history and detail.' - Steve Erikson, author of Gardens of the MoonA score of years after he first walked into the histories of Men, Anasûrimbor Kellhus rules all the Three Seas, the first true Aspect-Emperor in a thousand years. Wielding more power than even the greatest sorcerer, Kellhus now leads a holy war deep into the wastes of the Ancient North, intent on destroying the stronghold of Golgotterath and preventing the Second Apocalypse. Meanwhile his wife and consort, Esmenet, struggles to rule not only his vast empire, but their murderous children as well. And Achamian, who lives as a Wizard in embittered exile, undertakes a mad quest to uncover the origins of the Dûnyain. But Achamian, of all people, should know that one must be very careful what one seeks . . . First he was the Prince of Nothing, then the Warrior-Prophet.Now Anasurimbor Kellhus is the Aspect-Emperor. But is he a living god . . . or a demon from hell?Books by R Scott Baker:Prince of Nothing TrilogyThe Darkness That Comes BeforeThe Warrior-ProphetThe Thousandfold ThoughtAspect-EmperorThe Judging EyeThe White Luck WarriorThe Great OrdealThe Unholy ConsultNovelsNeuropathDisciple of the DogLight, Time, and Gravity
Price: 9.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £
-
What is the difference between discussing and judging?
Discussing involves exploring and exchanging ideas, opinions, and perspectives on a topic in a respectful and open-minded manner. It is a collaborative process that seeks to understand different viewpoints and reach a deeper understanding of the subject at hand. On the other hand, judging involves forming an opinion or making a decision about someone or something based on perceived qualities or actions. It often involves a more critical and evaluative approach, which may lead to a conclusion or a determination of value. In summary, discussing is about sharing and understanding different perspectives, while judging is about forming an opinion or making a decision based on those perspectives.
-
What is the difference between judging and evaluating?
Judging involves forming an opinion or making a decision based on personal values or beliefs, often leading to a more subjective assessment. Evaluating, on the other hand, involves assessing something based on specific criteria or standards, leading to a more objective analysis. While judging can be influenced by emotions and biases, evaluating focuses on gathering evidence and data to make a more informed and rational assessment.
-
What is the difference between judging and thinking?
Judging involves forming an opinion or making a decision based on a set of criteria or standards, often with a sense of finality or certainty. On the other hand, thinking is a broader cognitive process that involves analyzing, evaluating, and processing information to come to a conclusion or generate new ideas. Thinking is more open-ended and flexible, allowing for exploration of different perspectives and possibilities, while judging tends to be more focused on making a definitive assessment.
-
What is the difference between condemning and judging?
Condemning is expressing strong disapproval or criticism of someone's actions or behavior, often with a sense of moral outrage. It is a more severe form of judgment that typically involves passing a negative verdict on someone's character or actions. Judging, on the other hand, involves forming an opinion or evaluation about someone or something based on certain criteria or standards. While judging can be more neutral and objective, condemning tends to carry a more negative and punitive connotation.
* All prices are inclusive of VAT and, if applicable, plus shipping costs. The offer information is based on the details provided by the respective shop and is updated through automated processes. Real-time updates do not occur, so deviations can occur in individual cases.